PATLY.AIExaminer difficulty
How examiners in this art unit compare
The spread of examiners on each measure. Click a bar to see who is in it.
3-year grant rate
88%
+5 pts vs tech center 2800 allowed within 3 years of the first action
Allowance rate
89%
+4 pts vs tech center 2800 range 88% to 89%
Rejections before allowance
1.1
−0.1 vs tech center 2800
Months to first action
19.2 mo
+2.1 vs tech center 2800
In plain words
With Art unit 2838, 88% of applications were allowed within three years of the first office action, against 83% for tech center 2800. The first action takes 19.2 months on average.
Timeline
Applications by filing year: drag across the years to study a period
Allowed in green, abandoned in red, pending in grey. The figures above and every chart that can be recomputed by filing year follow the span you pick; the rest are marked all years.
Ask the record
Questions practitioners ask, answered from 33,537 applications
Grant rate from the first action
Share allowed, by months after the first office action
The gold line is this record and the blue line is tech center 2800. The marker is the three-year grant rate.
Outcome simulator
Where you are, what you do next, and the odds that follow
A model of this record’s own transitions: each examiner action, the response to it, and what came next. Thin data borrows from tech center 2800.
Prosecution paths
How prosecution actually unfolds
Every application’s sequence of examiner actions, from the first action to the outcome. Hover a band for the count.
Compared with peers
Against the art unit, the tech center and the USPTO
The same figures for this record, tech center 2800, the tech center and the whole office.
Allowance over time
How fast applications are allowed, or abandoned
Share allowed (gold) and abandoned (red) by month since filing, with pending cases counted only while they are pending.
Rejection fingerprint
What gets rejected, by statute
Share of office actions raising each ground; blue is tech center 2800.
What works
Allowance by strategy used
Allowance rate among decided cases where each move was used at least once, against tech center 2800.
Interviews
Does an interview help?
Allowance with and without an examiner interview, and how often interviews happen.
Odds by round
Chance the next action is an allowance
After the first, second and later rejections.
Response clock
Days from a response to the next action
How long the examiner takes to act once you have answered.
Quarter-end timing
When allowances land in the fiscal quarter
Allowances by week of the USPTO fiscal quarter. An even spread would put 15% in the last two weeks.
Appeals
What happens on appeal
Appeals filed, briefs, examiner’s answers, and how the Board decided.
Trend
Allowance rate by filing year
Is it getting easier or harder? Gold is this record, blue is tech center 2800.
Who files here
Assignees and firms with the most applications
How often each one was allowed with this unit.
Landscape
Examiners across tech center 2800
Each dot is an examiner: allowance rate across, rejections before allowance down, size by caseload. Click one to open it.
Examiners
Every examiner in the unit, ranked by difficulty
| Examiner | Applications | Allowance rate | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent N Trans | 2 | 0% | P100 |
| Monica Lewis | 66 | 15% | P98 Harder than peers |
| Carlos O Rivera-Perez | 600 | 74% | P94 Harder than peers |
| Lorena D Bruner | 165 | 77% | P93 Harder than peers |
| Ivan A Laboy Andino | 304 | 63% | P91 Harder than peers |
| Trinh Q Dang | 443 | 84% | P91 Harder than peers |
| Kevin H Sprenger | 293 | 83% | P86 Harder than peers |
| Gustavo A Rosario Benitez | 885 | 83% | P86 Harder than peers |
| Henry E Lee III | 421 | 81% | P84 Harder than peers |
| Demetries A Gibson | 232 | 80% | P83 Harder than peers |
| Bart Iliya | 290 | 82% | P80 Harder than peers |
| Matthew Grubb | 240 | 78% | P80 Harder than peers |
| Zekre A Tsehaye | 94 | 70% | P78 Harder than peers |
| Harry Raymond Behm | 1,302 | 82% | P75 Harder than peers |
| Muaamar Qahtan Al-Taweel | 170 | 81% | P73 Typical for peers |
| David Anthony Singh | 271 | 83% | P73 Typical for peers |
| Peter Michael Novak | 856 | 89% | P71 Typical for peers |
| Bryan Reynaldo Perez | 922 | 86% | P70 Typical for peers |
| Fred E Finch III | 1,137 | 83% | P70 Typical for peers |
| Sreeya Sreevatsa | 406 | 88% | P68 Typical for peers |
| Htet Z Kyaw | 309 | 84% | P65 Typical for peers |
| Samantha Lynette Faubert | 102 | 86% | P64 Typical for peers |
| Nusrat Quddus | 1,000 | 91% | P63 Typical for peers |
| Nguyen Tran | 1,426 | 86% | P60 Typical for peers |
| Alex Torres-Rivera | 1,075 | 89% | P60 Typical for peers |
| Jeffrey A Gblende | 1,145 | 89% | P56 Typical for peers |
| Lauren Ashley Shaw | 67 | 92% | P54 Typical for peers |
| Jye-June Lee | 730 | 89% | P53 Typical for peers |
| Alan K Stewart | 7 | 86% | P53 |
| Shahzeb K Ahmad | 616 | 86% | P48 Typical for peers |
| Yahveh Comas Torres | 147 | 89% | P47 Typical for peers |
| Jue Zhang | 1,415 | 88% | P43 Typical for peers |
| Sisay G Tiku | 965 | 93% | P39 Typical for peers |
| Lakaisha Jackson | 845 | 90% | P39 Typical for peers |
| Yemane Mehari | 1,342 | 92% | P36 Typical for peers |
| Ularislao Cordova Rodriguez | 76 | 89% | P35 Typical for peers |
| Ishrat F Jamali | 239 | 90% | P34 Typical for peers |
| Rafael O De Leon Domenech | 846 | 92% | P34 Typical for peers |
| Gary L Laxton | 1,819 | 91% | P32 Typical for peers |
| Jared Raymond Hausman | 8 | 86% | P30 |
| Kyle J Moody | 933 | 94% | P28 Typical for peers |
| Yusef A Ahmed | 1,147 | 91% | P27 Typical for peers |
| Rajnikant B Patel | 1,087 | 93% | P25 Easier than peers |
| Afework S Demisse | 831 | 95% | P22 Easier than peers |
| Bao Q Vu | 393 | 90% | P21 Easier than peers |
| Kevin Ramon Albright | 1 | 100% | P20 |
| Adolf D Berhane | 1,823 | 94% | P20 Easier than peers |
| Younghuie Jessica Han | 640 | 92% | P19 Easier than peers |
| Jeffrey L Sterrett | 657 | 91% | P19 Easier than peers |
| Matthew Van Nguyen | 1,184 | 95% | P18 Easier than peers |
| Gary A Nash | 1,102 | 93% | P18 Easier than peers |
| Jonathan Walter Soileau | 75 | 94% | P17 Easier than peers |
| Jennifer Christine Caulk | 101 | 98% | P17 Easier than peers |
| Shawn Riley | 439 | 93% | P16 Easier than peers |
| Seung Ho Choi | 95 | 100% | P10 Easier than peers |
| Naomi Lynn Carrier | 3 | 100% | P10 |
| Nicolas Alden Chapa Mills | 51 | 100% | P9 Easier than peers |
| Gabriel Alexander Rurycz | 2 | 100% | P6 |
| Daniel Robert Schwarck | 3 | 100% | P4 |
| Stuart Alan Hansen | 1 | 100% | P3 |