Examiner difficulty
How examiners in this art unit compare
The spread of examiners on each measure. Click a bar to see who is in it.
In plain words
With Art unit 2887, 77% of applications were allowed within three years of the first office action, against 83% for tech center 2800. The first action takes 11.4 months on average.
Examiner difficulty
The spread of examiners on each measure. Click a bar to see who is in it.
Timeline
Allowed in green, abandoned in red, pending in grey. The figures above and every chart that can be recomputed by filing year follow the span you pick; the rest are marked all years.
Ask the record
Grant rate from the first action
The gold line is this record and the blue line is tech center 2800. The marker is the three-year grant rate.
Outcome simulator
A model of this record’s own transitions: each examiner action, the response to it, and what came next. Thin data borrows from tech center 2800.
Prosecution paths
Every application’s sequence of examiner actions, from the first action to the outcome. Hover a band for the count.
Compared with peers
The same figures for this record, tech center 2800, the tech center and the whole office.
Allowance over time
Share allowed (gold) and abandoned (red) by month since filing, with pending cases counted only while they are pending.
Rejection fingerprint
Share of office actions raising each ground; blue is tech center 2800.
What works
Allowance rate among decided cases where each move was used at least once, against tech center 2800.
Interviews
Allowance with and without an examiner interview, and how often interviews happen.
Odds by round
After the first, second and later rejections.
Response clock
How long the examiner takes to act once you have answered.
Quarter-end timing
Allowances by week of the USPTO fiscal quarter. An even spread would put 15% in the last two weeks.
Appeals
Appeals filed, briefs, examiner’s answers, and how the Board decided.
Trend
Is it getting easier or harder? Gold is this record, blue is tech center 2800.
Who files here
How often each one was allowed with this unit.
Landscape
Each dot is an examiner: allowance rate across, rejections before allowance down, size by caseload. Click one to open it.
Examiners
| Examiner | Applications | Allowance rate | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tae W Kim | 347 | 58% | P96 Harder than peers |
| Minghui Yang | 20 | 25% | P90 |
| William Michael Anderson Jr | 16 | 38% | P87 |
| Kumiko C Koyama | 17 | 29% | P86 |
| Thien T Mai | 717 | 61% | P81 Harder than peers |
| Asifa Habib | 407 | 79% | P69 Typical for peers |
| Daniel I Walsh | 1,013 | 69% | P63 Typical for peers |
| Sonji N Johnson | 910 | 78% | P62 Typical for peers |
| April Alicia Taylor | 784 | 81% | P54 Typical for peers |
| Tuyen Kim Vo | 1,511 | 83% | P34 Typical for peers |
| Claude J Brown | 654 | 83% | P29 Typical for peers |
| Christle I Marshall | 935 | 84% | P28 Typical for peers |
| Karl D Frech | 1,020 | 89% | P22 Easier than peers |
| Thien Minh Le | 1,503 | 90% | P21 Easier than peers |
| Edwyn Labaze | 1,708 | 92% | P20 Easier than peers |
| Toan C Ly | 803 | 86% | P20 Easier than peers |
| Seung H Lee | 1,627 | 91% | P11 Easier than peers |