Patent AnalyticsExaminers
Menu

Art unit

Art unit 3794

Tech center 370059 examiners12,367 applicationsMostly A61B, A61F, A61N, A61M

3-year grant rate
64%
−2 pts vs tech center 3700 allowed within 3 years of the first action
Allowance rate
71%
level with tech center 3700 range 70% to 72%
Rejections before allowance
2.2
+0.4 vs tech center 3700
Months to first action
26.2 mo
+5.5 vs tech center 3700

In plain words

With Art unit 3794, 64% of applications were allowed within three years of the first office action, against 67% for tech center 3700. The first action takes 26.2 months on average.

Examiner difficulty

How examiners in this art unit compare

The spread of examiners on each measure. Click a bar to see who is in it.

Timeline

Applications by filing year: drag across the years to study a period

Allowed in green, abandoned in red, pending in grey. The figures above and every chart that can be recomputed by filing year follow the span you pick; the rest are marked all years.

Ask the record

Questions practitioners ask, answered from 12,367 applications

Grant rate from the first action

Share allowed, by months after the first office action

The gold line is this record and the blue line is tech center 3700. The marker is the three-year grant rate.

Outcome simulator

Where you are, what you do next, and the odds that follow

A model of this record’s own transitions: each examiner action, the response to it, and what came next. Thin data borrows from tech center 3700.

Unlock the outcome simulatorIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Prosecution paths

How prosecution actually unfolds

Every application’s sequence of examiner actions, from the first action to the outcome. Hover a band for the count.

Unlock the prosecution pathsIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Compared with peers

Against the art unit, the tech center and the USPTO

The same figures for this record, tech center 3700, the tech center and the whole office.

Unlock the peer comparisonIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Allowance over time

How fast applications are allowed, or abandoned

Share allowed (gold) and abandoned (red) by month since filing, with pending cases counted only while they are pending.

Unlock the allowance curveIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Rejection fingerprint

What gets rejected, by statute

Share of office actions raising each ground; blue is tech center 3700.

Unlock the rejection fingerprintIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

What works

Allowance by strategy used

Allowance rate among decided cases where each move was used at least once, against tech center 3700.

Unlock what works hereIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Interviews

Does an interview help?

Allowance with and without an examiner interview, and how often interviews happen.

Unlock the interview benefitIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Odds by round

Chance the next action is an allowance

After the first, second and later rejections.

Unlock the odds by roundIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Response clock

Days from a response to the next action

How long the examiner takes to act once you have answered.

Unlock the response clockIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Quarter-end timing

When allowances land in the fiscal quarter

Allowances by week of the USPTO fiscal quarter. An even spread would put 15% in the last two weeks.

Unlock the quarter timingIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Appeals

What happens on appeal

Appeals filed, briefs, examiner’s answers, and how the Board decided.

Unlock the appeal statisticsIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Trend

Allowance rate by filing year

Is it getting easier or harder? Gold is this record, blue is tech center 3700.

Unlock the trendIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Who files here

Assignees and firms with the most applications

How often each one was allowed with this unit.

Unlock who files hereIncluded in Pro, from $29 a month. Cancel any time.

See plans Sign in

Landscape

Examiners across tech center 3700

Each dot is an examiner: allowance rate across, rejections before allowance down, size by caseload. Click one to open it.

Examiners

Every examiner in the unit, ranked by difficulty

ExaminerApplicationsAllowance rateDifficulty
Christopher A Holden10%P98
Aditi Shenoy10%P98
Matthew David Becton2928%P94
Abigail M Ziegler16146%P91 Harder than peers
Ashleigh Lauren Kern11338%P90 Harder than peers
Yasamin Ekrami35242%P90 Harder than peers
Alyssa Morgan Pape10425%P87 Harder than peers
Davina En-Yin Lee12140%P84 Harder than peers
Linda C Dvorak12213%P81 Harder than peers
Ana Veruska Guerrero Rosario13644%P80 Harder than peers
Catherine C Premraj30158%P77 Harder than peers
Lindsay Regan Lancaster17053%P77 Harder than peers
Nora W Rhodes19656%P75 Harder than peers
Casey George Cha4715%P73 Typical for peers
Dana Lynn Stumpfoll12455%P72 Typical for peers
Ryan T Clark33352%P71 Typical for peers
Adam Joseph Avigan54346%P70 Typical for peers
Bo Ouyang50262%P68 Typical for peers
Christine A Dedoulis16466%P67 Typical for peers
Marina Delaney Templeton16963%P64 Typical for peers
Rachel A Vierra13860%P64 Typical for peers
Kyle Martz Brown10411%P63 Typical for peers
Christian Manuel Sarceno Robles3850%P52 Typical for peers
Adam Zachary Minchella45365%P48 Typical for peers
Bradford Christopher Blaise39364%P48 Typical for peers
Nils A Potter4670%P47 Typical for peers
Samantha M Good44770%P44 Typical for peers
Annie Lee Shoulders28975%P44 Typical for peers
Jaymi E Della91470%P44 Typical for peers
Jr, Ronald James Hupczey83769%P41 Typical for peers
William Eric Mossbrook10059%P40 Typical for peers
Annabeth Eliesse Rodriguez10370%P39 Typical for peers
Christopher Patrick Gloth333%P39
Brian Michael Antiskay72370%P38 Typical for peers
Kaitlyn Elizabeth Smith83759%P37 Typical for peers
Raghav Chowdary Atluri1100%P29
Caitlyn E May743%P28
Sean W Collins45576%P28 Typical for peers
Khadijeh A Vahdat73280%P27 Typical for peers
Eun Hwa Kim66075%P25 Easier than peers
Thomas Anthony Giuliani89578%P23 Easier than peers
Christina Meraiah Ganan-Singh4350%P22 Easier than peers
Nicholas S Borsch20377%P20 Easier than peers
Katherine E Maziarski667%P20
Dustin P Clary475%P17
Mystee Nguyen Delgado2479%P17
Daniel Wayne Fowler1,13876%P17 Easier than peers
Tigist S Demie60878%P15 Easier than peers
Michael F Peffley1,33781%P12 Easier than peers
James A Cipriano1984%P9
Beverly Meindl Flanagan18382%P8 Easier than peers
Abigail Marie Bock24091%P7 Easier than peers